In re SCANA Corporation Securities Litigation
|Court:||United States District Court, District of South Carolina (Columbia Division)|
|Judge:||Hon. Margaret B. Seymour|
|Class Period:||01/19/2016 - 10/30/2017|
|Case Contacts:||John C. Browne, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, Michael Mathai, Kate Aufses|
This case is In re SCANA Corporation Securities Litigation, No. 17-cv-2616 (D.S.C.) (the “Action”), a securities class action lawsuit brought against SCANA Corporation (“SCANA” or the “Company”) and certain of the Company’s senior executives. The Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs are Blue Sky Group and West Virginia Investment Management Board. Bernstein Litowitz represents Blue Sky Group. As described further below, the parties have reached a $192.5 million settlement in this Action (the "Settlement"), which has been finally approved by the Court.
SCANA provides electricity and natural gas to roughly 1.6 million customers in the Southeastern United States. In 2008, SCANA began constructing two new nuclear reactors at the V.C. Summer site near Jenkinsville, South Carolina. Throughout the class period, SCANA allegedly made false and misleading statements that the construction was progressing well. Lead Plaintiffs also allege SCANA also represented it was acting prudently when working on the nuclear project and, on that basis, successfully sought $1.7 billion in increased customer rates to offset construction costs.
The Action alleged that while SCANA was touting its progress, the Company and its senior executives knew the project suffered from a host of fundamental problems. In October 2015, defendants received an independent report from expert consultants that detailed formidable obstacles, massive cost overruns, and imprudent management. The 130-page report concluded that “there [were] significant issues facing the project,” including “plans and schedules [that] are not reflective of actual project circumstances” and an engineering design which “is not yet completed” and “not constructible.” However, defendants continued constructing the plants, touting its purported progress, and charging increased rates for well over a year.
In the summer of 2017, following the bankruptcy of its chief contractor due in large part to their work on the nuclear reactors, SCANA announced that it would abandon the construction of the nuclear reactors, after having charged their clients billions of dollars for this failed endeavor. Numerous public investigations were initiated and, numerous internal communications and the initial and final versions of the independent expert report that SCANA received were made public. In addition, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in South Carolina and the FBI initiated a criminal investigation, and SCANA’s CEO and executive vice president left the Company.
Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint on March 30, 2018 (the “Complaint”), asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule l0b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Court denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint on March 29, 2019, and the case proceeded into discovery.
Lead Plaintiffs Have Settled the Action for $192.5 Million
On October 2, 2019, Lead Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Settlement Class (defined below) reached an agreement-in-principle with defendants to settle the Action for $192,500,000, with $160,000,000 being paid in cash and $32,500,000 being paid in cash or shares of freely-tradable Dominion Energy, Inc. (“Dominion Energy”) common stock (the “Settlement”), at the option of SCANA Corporation (“SCANA” or the “Company”). On December 20, 2019, the parties entered into the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, which sets forth the final terms and conditions of the Settlement.
On February 11, 2020, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement and authorized notice to be disseminated to potential Settlement Class Members. On June 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing on final approval of the Settlement and related matters. On July 23, 2020, the Court entered an Order and Opinion approving the Settlement, an Order and Opinion approving the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlement, and an Order and Opinion awarding attorney's fees and litigation expenses to Plaintiffs’ Counsel.
If you are a member of the Settlement Class, your rights will be affected and you may be eligible for a payment from the Settlement. The Settlement Class consists of:
All persons and entities who or which, purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded SCANA common stock, during the period from October 27, 2015 through December 20, 2017, inclusive (the "Class Period"), and were damaged thereby, except for certain persons and entities who are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition as set forth in paragraph 27 of the Notice.
Please read the Notice to fully understand your rights and options.
If you are a member of the Settlement Class, in order to be potentially eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement, you must submit a Claim Form postmarked or submitted electronically no later than July 25, 2020.
Payments to eligible claimants will be made only after the completion of all claims processing. Please be patient, as this process will take some time to complete.
JULY 25, 2020
To be eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement, you must mail the Claim Form and supporting documentation, postmarked no later than July 25, 2020, or submit it electronically no later than July 25, 2020 in accordance with the instructions in the Notice and Claim Form.
Other Cases of Interest
Wells Fargo & Company
Northern District of California Salvatore J. Graziano, Adam H. Wierzbowski, Rebecca E. Boon, Scott R. Foglietta, Michael Mathai, Alex Dickin
Southern District of New York James A. Harrod, Michael D. Blatchley, Rebecca N. Kim, Michael Mathai, Christopher Miles, Matt Mulligan, Amy Bitkower, Nicholas DeFilippis, Adam Weinschel
Venator Materials PLC
Southern District of Texas, Houston Division John C. Browne, Michael D. Blatchley, Nicholas Gersh
Allergan, Inc. (Drug Pricing)
District of New Jersey John C. Browne, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, Michael Mathai, Nicholas Gersh, Erika Connolly
Southern District of New York John C. Browne, David Wales, John Rizio-Hamilton, Jeremy P. Robinson, Laura Lefkowitz, Catherine E. van Kampen
District of Delaware Katherine M. Sinderson, Hannah Ross, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, Richard D. Gluck, Catherine E. van Kampen, Jesse L. Jensen, Alex Dickin
Southern District of New York John C. Browne, Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Jesse L. Jensen, Kate Aufses, Alex Dickin, Catherine E. van Kampen
GT Advanced Technologies Inc.
District of New Hampshire John C. Browne, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, Catherine E. van Kampen
Southern District of New York Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Lauren M. Cruz, Will Horowitz
Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc.
Delaware Chancery Court Mark Lebovitch, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Christopher J. Orrico, Alla Zayenchik