Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al. v. Insulet Corp., et al.
|Court:||United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts|
|Judge:||Hon. Mark L. Wolf|
|Class Period:||05/07/2013 - 04/30/2015|
|Case Contacts:||James A. Harrod, Rebecca E. Boon|
This is a securities fraud class action filed on behalf of a class of persons and entities who purchased or acquired Insulet Corporation’s (“Insulet” or the “Company”) publicly traded common stock from May 7, 2013 to April 30, 2015, inclusive (the “Settlement Class Period”). Lead Plaintiffs allege that Insulet and certain of its senior officers (collectively, “Defendants”) defrauded investors by misrepresenting the success of a new version of the Company’s core product—the OmniPod Eros, a wearable insulin infusion pump that represented 81% of Insulet’s revenue.
Lead Plaintiffs Have Settled the Action for $19.5 Million
The Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, the City of Bristol Pension Fund, and the City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System, have reached a settlement of this action for $19,500,000 in cash that resolves all claims in the action.
If you are a member of the Settlement Class, your rights will be affected and you may be eligible for a payment from the settlement. The Settlement Class consists of:
all persons who purchased Insulet common stock during the period commencing on May 7, 2013 through April 30, 2015, inclusive, except for certain persons and entities who are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition (see, Question 3 on page 6 of the Notice).
Please read the Notice to fully understand your rights and options. Copies of the Notice and Claim Form can be found on the Case Documents page. You may also visit the Settlement website, www.InsuletSecuritiesLitigation.com, for more information about the Settlement.
The Court held a hearing on August 2, 2018 to consider whether the Settlement should be approved and related matters. On August 6, 2018, the Court entered an order approving the Settlement and Plan of Allocation. An accompanying motion for Lead Counsel’s attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s litigation expenses and for payments to the Lead Plaintiffs, all to be paid out of the $19.5 million settlement fund, remains pending before the Court.
Payments to eligible claimants will be made only after the Court enters the Judgment, and only after any appeals are resolved, and after the completion of all claims processing. Please be patient, as this process will take some time to complete.
IMPORTANT DATES AND DEADLINES
September 4, 2018
Claim Filing Deadline. The Court-ordered deadline for submission of Claim Forms was September 4, 2018. The Court retains discretion to accept late claims.
In this Action, Lead Plaintiffs allege that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements to investors touting the quality of the OmniPod Eros, the successful launch of the product, customers’ broad acceptance of the product, and the high rate of new patient starts during the Settlement Class Period. Lead Plaintiffs allege that, in reality, the OmniPod Eros was plagued by defects that not only affected customer acceptance and demand, but also the Company’s revenue and that—rather than disclosing the truth, nature, and extent of these defects—Defendants continued to authorize shipment of the product over the objections of the Company’s quality assurance department and continued to misrepresent the number of new patients beginning to use the product.
Lead Plaintiffs further allege that truth was revealed through a series of corrective disclosures starting in early 2015. On January 7, 2015, Insulet disclosed that its fourth quarter 2014 revenue would be $5 to $8 million less than its prior guidance due to reduced demand for the OmniPod Eros. The same day, the Company announced that its new CEO was replacing six senior executives. A week later, the CEO warned that analysts’ estimates of the Company’s performance for 2015 were too high, and he simultaneously disclosed that the launch of the Eros product had been much less successful than the Company had claimed. Finally, in February 2015, Insulet announced its fourth quarter 2014 earnings, which revealed that sales of the product in the United States were worse than originally thought. The price of Insulet shares fell significantly in response to each of these disclosures.
Plaintiffs filed the initial Complaint in this action in June 2015 and an Amended Complaint in June 2016. In March 2016, the Court appointed the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, the City of Bristol Pension fund, and the City of Omaha Police and Retirement Fund as Lead Plaintiffs and appointed BLB&G as co-Lead Counsel. Defendants moved to dismiss the securities claims in August 2016; after a hearing in March 2017, the Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Discovery in the Action commenced in April 2017. Defendants and over two dozen third parties produced a total of more than 130,000 pages of documents (exclusive of voluminous files of computerized data) in response to Lead Plaintiffs’ requests for production of documents and third-party subpoenas.
On July 20, 2017 counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and for Defendants participated in a lengthy, in-person mediation session before David Geronemus, Esq. of JAMS, a highly experienced mediator of complex actions, but no agreement was reached. Only after months of additional negotiations, on November 27, 2017, the Parties (with the assistance of the Mr. Geronemus) were able to reach an agreement in principle to settle the Action
On February 8, 2018, the Parties entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”), which sets forth the final and complete terms and conditions of the Settlement. If approved by the Court, the Settlement will settle and release all claims asserted in the Action in return for a $19.5 million cash payment.
On August 2, 2018, the Court held a hearing to consider whether the Settlement should be approved and related matters. On August 6, 2018, the Court entered an order approving the Settlement and Plan of Allocation. An accompanying motion for Lead Counsel’s attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s litigation expenses and for payments to the Lead Plaintiffs, all to be paid out of the $19.5 million settlement fund, remains pending before the Court.
Other Cases of Interest
Northern District of California Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jeremy P. Robinson, Rebecca E. Boon
Signet Jewelers Limited
Southern District of New York John Rizio-Hamilton, Rebecca E. Boon, Michael Mathai, Brenna Nelinson
Southern District of California Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Richard D. Gluck, Rebecca E. Boon, Kyle Panton, Lauren M. Cruz
Southern District of New York John C. Browne, Timothy A. DeLange, Richard D. Gluck, Rebecca E. Boon
Perrigo Company plc
District of New Jersey James A. Harrod, Jesse L. Jensen
Micro Focus International, plc
Southern District of New York James A. Harrod, Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Julia Tebor
General Motors Company
Eastern District of Michigan Salvatore J. Graziano, James A. Harrod, Adam H. Wierzbowski, Rebecca E. Boon
Trinity Industries, Inc.
Northern District of Texas James A. Harrod, Adam Hollander
Henry Schein, Inc.
Eastern District of New York James A. Harrod, Michael Mathai
Northern District of California Gerald H. Silk, Avi Josefson, James A. Harrod, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Adam Hollander