Tsantes v. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., et al

Court: Northern District of California
Case Number: 3:20-cv-06719
Judge: William H. Orrick
Class Period: 02/28/2020 - 08/18/2020
Case Contacts: Jonathan D. Uslaner, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Avi Josefson

On September 25, 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging violations of the federal securities laws against BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (“BioMarin” or the “Company”) and certain of the Company’s senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”).  The lawsuit was brought on behalf of investors in BioMarin that purchased BioMarin stock between February 28, 2020 and August 18, 2020, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  BLB&G currently is undertaking an investigation into the misconduct alleged in the complaint.

BioMarin’s Alleged Fraud

Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the durability and efficacy data for BioMarin’s gene therapy treatment for hemophilia A, Valrox (valoctocogene roxaparvovec), and the likelihood that the Company’s December 23, 2019 Biologics License Application (BLA) would be approved by the FDA by August 21, 2020 on the basis of preliminary Phase 3 trial data.  Despite that initial Phase 3 trial data submitted to the FDA showed potential issues with the long-term effectiveness of the drug due to a decline in Factor VIII levels in patients over time, BioMarin assured investors that it was “pretty impressive data” that showed “phenomenal hemostatic efficacy,” and that investors should not be concerned that it would negatively impact the FDA approval process, which was “going quite well” with a “high likelihood of approval” and would allow the drug to “launch[] in the second half of” 2020.

The truth emerged on August 19, 2020, when BioMarin announced that the Company had received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA, which included the FDA’s concerns about the initial Phase 3 data’s indication of a declining durability of effect.  BioMarin disclosed that the FDA declined to approve the BLA and would require that BioMarin complete its Phase 3 trial and submit two-year follow-up safety and efficacy data on all participants before any possible approval.  Accordingly, FDA approval of BioMarin’s BLA for Valrox cannot happen until at least 2022.  In response to these disclosures, BioMarin’s stock price dropped $41.82 per share, or 35.28%, to close at $76.72 per share on August 19, 2020.

On November 24, 2020, BLB&G client Arbejdsmarkedets Tillægspension moved for appointment as lead plaintiff.

Other Cases of Interest

  • Intel Corporation
    Northern District of California John Rizio-Hamilton, Jeroen van Kwawegen, James M. Fee
  • Symantec Corporation
    Northern District of California Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jeremy P. Robinson, Rebecca E. Boon, R. Ryan Dykhouse, Larry Hosmer,
  • Viacom
    Delaware Court of Chancery Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Edward G. Timlin, Andrew Blumberg, Daniel Meyer
  • Straight Path Communications Inc.
    Delaware Chancery Court Mark Lebovitch, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Edward G. Timlin, Alla Zayenchik,
  • Regency
    Delaware Court of Chancery Jeroen van Kwawegen, Edward G. Timlin, Gregory V. Varallo,
  • Mohawk Industries, Inc.
    Northern District of Georgia John C. Browne, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Richard D. Gluck, Lauren M. Cruz, Alexander T. Payne
  • Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
    Western District of Wisconsin Avi Josefson, Katherine M. Sinderson, Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Matthew Traylor
  • Wells Fargo
    Southern District of New York Jonathan D. Uslaner, Lauren M. Cruz, Will Horowitz
  • Converium Holding AG (U.S. Action)
    Southern District of New York Avi Josefson, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee