|Court:||United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|
|Class Period:||02/24/2021 - 02/23/2022|
|Case Leaders:||Scott R. Foglietta, James A. Harrod, Avi Josefson, Hannah Ross|
|Case Team:||Caitlin Bozman, Jai K. Chandrasekhar|
On May 3, 2022, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (“BLB&G”) filed a class action lawsuit for violations of the federal securities laws in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Vertiv Holding Co (“Vertiv” or the “Company”), certain of the Company’s senior executives, members of the Company’s Board of Directors, underwriters of Vertiv’s November 4, 2021 secondary public offerings (“SPO”), certain shareholders that sold shares offered in the SPO, and controlling shareholder Platinum Equity, LLC and certain of its affiliated entities (collectively, “Defendants”). The complaint expands the class period that was asserted in a previously filed related securities class action pending against Vertiv captioned Vinings v. Vertiv Holdings Co, No. 1:22-cv-02416 (S.D.N.Y.), and is brought on behalf of investors that incurred damages on their purchases of Vertiv Class A common stock between February 24, 2021 and February 23, 2022, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and/or investors that purchased Vertiv Class A common stock in or traceable to the SPO.
BLB&G filed this action on behalf of its client, City of Riviera Beach General Employees’ Retirement System, and the case is captioned City of Riviera Beach General Employees’ Retirement System v. Vertiv Holdings Co, No. 1:22-cv-3572 (S.D.N.Y.). The complaint is based on an extensive investigation and a careful evaluation of the merits of this case. To view the complaint, see the Case Documents section of this page.
Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, Vertiv is a data center solutions company focused on software, hardware, and analytics serving social media, financial services, healthcare, transportation, retail, education, and government industries through a network of direct sales professionals, independent sales representatives, channel partners, and original equipment manufacturers in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Vertiv became public through the usage of a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (“SPAC”). On or about February 7, 2020, Vertiv Holdings Co completed its business combination with GS Acquisition Holdings Corp. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC acted as lead placement agent and exclusive financial advisor to GS Acquisition Holdings Corp.
The complaint alleges that, in the offering materials issued in connection with the SPO and throughout the Class Period, Vertiv made numerous false and misleading representations concerning the extent of its pricing visibility, which had a significant impact on company margins. Moreover, Vertiv directly tied its positive financial guidance to its pricing mechanisms. The complaint also alleges that the Company had internal control issues related to their sales practices leading to excessive discounting in order to secure sales; the Company labeled this a “cultural” issue. In addition, the complaint alleges that the Company represented reoccurring costs as onetime occurrences.
The truth began to emerge on February 23, 2022, when Vertiv released its fourth quarter and full year earnings report for 2021. Adjusted operating income was reported at 43% below the low end of management’s own guidance range; a vast departure from constructive management commentary throughout the entire fourth quarter of 2021. As a result of these disclosures, the price of Vertiv stock declined by $7.19 per share, or over 36% (from $19.57 per share to $12.38 per share on February 23, 2022, alone). Despite these disclosures, however, Vertiv downplayed the significance of the miss and provided investors with false assurances about the strength of the Company’s forecasted revenues and growth prospects. In accordance with our investigation, our complaint alleges an expanded class period of February 24, 2021 through February 23, 2022, and asserts additional claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77l(a)(2), and 77o.
On June 22, 2022, the Court appointed the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Pension & Relief Fund, Orlando Police Pension Fund, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System, Riviera Beach Municipal Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund, and City of Riviera Beach General Employees’ Retirement System as Lead Plaintiffs and approved their selection of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP and Saxena White P.A. as Lead Counsel for the Class. We filed the consolidated amended complaint on September 16, 2022, and Defendants’ deadline to respond to the consolidated amended complaint is November 15, 2022.
- News BLB&G Announces Elevation of Two Senior Counsel February 1, 2023 Learn More
- Awards BTI Consulting Group Once Again Names BLB&G an Intimidating Opponent and One of the Most Feared Law Firms in Litigation January 27, 2023 Learn More
- Publications “2022 Developments for Auditor Regulation Under the U.S. Securities Laws” by John Rizio-Hamilton, Jesse L. Jensen, and Jasmine Cooper-Little Published in The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation January 27, 2023 Learn More
- Publications “The SEC's run at revamping Rule 10b5-1 to deter insider trading” by Jonathan D. Uslaner and Caitlin Bozman Published in Reuters January 26, 2023 Learn More
- Awards BLB&G Leads ISS SCAS List of Top 100 Securities Class-Action Settlements of All Time January 25, 2023 Learn More