|Court:||Delaware Court of Chancery|
|Case Leaders:||Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Edward G. Timlin|
|Case Team:||Daniel Meyer|
This stockholder class action on behalf of former stockholders of TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation (“Ameritrade”) challenges the stock-for-stock merger (the “Merger”) of Ameritrade and The Charles Schwab Corporation (“Schwab”). In connection with the merger, Schwab entered into an agreement (the “Amended IDA Agreement”) with The Toronto-Dominion Bank (together with its affiliates, “TD Bank”). TD Bank was Ameritrade’s controlling stockholder, and the Amended IDA Agreement is worth hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars to TD Bank.
The initial complaint was filed on May 12, 2020. On May 15, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for expedition. Thereafter, Ameritrade provided Ameritrade stockholders with certain 8 Del. C. § 203 (“Section 203”)-related disclosures and asked stockholders to approve the transaction by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding unaffiliated shares of Ameritrade common stock.
Plaintiff thereafter incorporated discovery related to his Section 203 claim into an amended complaint, which was filed on February 5, 2021. The amended complaint alleges that the Merger was the product of an unfair process that resulted in an unfair price for Ameritrade’s stockholders. Specifically, the amended complaint alleges that, before the Merger, Ameritrade and TD Bank were parties to a prior agreement (the “IDA Agreement”) that significantly diverged from market terms and that was extremely favorable to TD Bank. The IDA Agreement was set to expire in the coming years, and it was more favorable to Schwab to terminate the IDA Agreement and either enter into a new one on market terms or not contract out the services and perform them itself. Instead, Schwab directly negotiated with TD Bank the Amended IDA Agreement, which funneled Merger consideration directly to TD Bank in exchange for its support for the Merger. Ameritrade directors stood by idly and allowed this diversion of value that should have been paid pro rata to all Ameritrade stockholders.
The amended complaint, asserts breach of fiduciary duty claims against TD Bank, as Ameritrade’s controller, and certain Ameritrade officers and directors. The amended complaint also asserts a claim against Schwab for aiding and abetting such breaches.
- Awards The National Black Lawyers Association Selects Associate Matthew Traylor for Membership & "Top 40 Under 40" List October 18, 2021 Learn More
- Awards Benchmark Litigation Again Names BLB&G One of the Top Firms in the Nation in 2022 Guide October 5, 2021 Learn More
- Events Katie Sinderson Serves as Panelist at OPFTEC 2021 on "The Role of Securities Litigation in Pension Funds" October 1, 2021 Learn More
- Events BLB&G Partners John C. Browne and Jeremy Robinson Present "Video Depositions: The Case for Their Continued Relevance in a Post-Quarantine World" Webinar October 1, 2021 Learn More
- Events BLB&G Partner Jeroen van Kwawegen Speaks at Broadridge Webinar on "International Opt-In Cases: Evolving Mechanisms for Collective Redress" September 30, 2021 Learn More