|Court:||United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|
|Class Period:||09/28/2006 - 09/16/2008|
|Case Leader:||John C. Browne|
This is a securities class action filed on behalf of a class of persons and entities who purchased or acquired securities of the Reserve Primary Fund between September 28, 2006 and September 16, 2008 (the “Class Period”). On August 26, 2009, the Honorable Paul G. Gardephe appointed BLB&G client Third Avenue Institutional International Value Fund, L.P. as Lead Plaintiff and BLB&G as Lead Counsel for the Class.
On September 16, 2008, The Reserve announced that its premier money market fund – the $62 billion Primary Fund – had “broken the buck,” or fallen below the required $1.00 net asset value (“NAV”). Money market funds are designed to serve as an extremely safe, low-yield alternative to holding cash or investing money in short term instruments. Defendants repeatedly marketed the Primary Fund as the epitome of a “safe” and “conservative” money market fund, and emphasized the Primary Fund’s superiority over competitor funds that had purportedly “prostituted” the concept of money market funds “by putting garbage in the funds and reaching for yield.” Because of the Primary Fund’s exposure to risky commercial paper, including $785 million in commercial paper issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman Brothers”), the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy announcement on September 15, 2008 caused the Primary Fund to suffer losses so severe that it became the first, and to this date only, retail money market fund to face liquidation.
On January 5, 2010, BLB&G filed the Consolidated Class Action Complaint on behalf of Lead Plaintiff and the Class. Defendants moved to dismiss on June 25, 2010, Lead Plaintiff filed its opposition brief on August 13, 2010, and Defendants' filed their reply on September 3, 2010. On September 28, 2012, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motions to dismiss.
On September 6, 2013, Lead Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement. Click here to see copy of Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Preliminary Approval. On October 1, 2013, Lead Plaintiff filed a reply to its motion for preliminary approval, noting that no class members had objected to granting preliminary approval. Click here to see a copy of Lead Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum. On October 7, 2013, the Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed Settlement and set a final approval hearing for December 16, 2013. Click here for a copy of the Court’s preliminary approval order.
On November 11, 2013, Lead Plaintiff filed a motion for final approval of the settlement, and the award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. Click here for a copy of Lead Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of Final Approval of the Settlement. Click here for a copy of Lead Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses. Click here for a copy of the Declaration of John C. Browne in support of both motions.
On January 31, 2014, the Court entered an order granting final approval of the settlement.
- Awards BLB&G Partner Abe Alexander Named to 2022 List of “Rising Stars of the Plaintiffs Bar” by The National Law Journal May 13, 2022 Learn More
- Awards BLB&G Partner Hannah Ross Named to 2022 List of “Elite Women of the Plaintiffs Bar” by The National Law Journal May 11, 2022 Learn More
- Publications "Forewarned is forearmed: shareholders to benefit from new SEC climate disclosure rules" by Jonathan D. Uslaner and Ryan Dykhouse Published in Reuters May 9, 2022 Learn More
- Publications "3 Financial Market Areas That Need Better Disclosure Regimes" by Adam Hollander and Thomas Sperber Published in Law360 May 5, 2022 Learn More
- Publications "Ninth Circuit Slack Decision Withstands En Banc Rehearing Petition: Is A Supreme Court Cert Petition Next?" by BLB&G Partners John C. Browne and Lauren Ormsbee May 4, 2022 Learn More