|Court:||United States District Court for the Northern District of California|
|Class Period:||02/28/2020 - 08/18/2020|
|Case Leaders:||Katherine M. Sinderson, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Avi Josefson, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Abe Alexander|
|Case Team:||Thomas Sperber, William E. Freeland|
On September 25, 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging violations of the federal securities laws against BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (“BioMarin” or the “Company”) and certain of the Company’s senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”). The lawsuit was brought on behalf of investors in BioMarin that purchased BioMarin stock between February 28, 2020 and August 18, 2020, inclusive (the “Class Period”).
Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the likelihood that the Company’s December 23, 2019 Biologics License Application (BLA) would be approved by the FDA by August 21, 2020 on the basis of preliminary Phase 3 trial data. Defendants knew of the FDA’s concerns that the initial Phase 3 trial data showed potential issues with the long-term effectiveness of the drug due to a decline in Factor VIII levels in patients over time. According to Defendants’ own subsequent admissions, Defendants had no dialogue whatsoever with the FDA from mid-April 2020 to June 2020, at which point Defendants learned that a facility inspection—required for FDA approval—would not occur prior to August 21, 2020. Despite this knowledge, BioMarin assured investors that the FDA approval process was “going quite well,” that the FDA had been “quite collaborative” and in a “mesh” with Defendants, and that the drug would “launch in the second half of” 2020.
The truth emerged on August 19, 2020, when BioMarin announced that the Company had received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA, which included the FDA’s concerns about the initial Phase 3 data’s indication of a declining durability of effect. BioMarin disclosed that the FDA declined to approve the BLA and would require that BioMarin complete its Phase 3 trial and submit two-year follow-up safety and efficacy data on all participants before any possible approval. Accordingly, FDA approval of BioMarin’s BLA for Valrox cannot happen until at least 2022. In response to these disclosures, BioMarin’s stock price dropped $41.82 per share, or 35.28%, to close at $76.72 per share on August 19, 2020.
On December 22, 2020, the Court appointed Arbejdsmarkedets Tillægspension lead plaintiff, and approved BLB&G as lead counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Class Action Complaint on February 22, 2021. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 22, 2021. On January 6, 2022, the Honorable William Orrick III denied the Motion to Dismiss and sustained the Complaint in its entirety. The case is now in discovery.
- Awards BLB&G Partner Abe Alexander Named to 2022 List of “Rising Stars of the Plaintiffs Bar” by The National Law Journal May 13, 2022 Learn More
- Awards BLB&G Partner Hannah Ross Named to 2022 List of “Elite Women of the Plaintiffs Bar” by The National Law Journal May 11, 2022 Learn More
- Publications "Forewarned is forearmed: shareholders to benefit from new SEC climate disclosure rules" by Jonathan D. Uslaner and Ryan Dykhouse Published in Reuters May 9, 2022 Learn More
- Publications "3 Financial Market Areas That Need Better Disclosure Regimes" by Adam Hollander and Thomas Sperber Published in Law360 May 5, 2022 Learn More
- Publications "Ninth Circuit Slack Decision Withstands En Banc Rehearing Petition: Is A Supreme Court Cert Petition Next?" by BLB&G Partners John C. Browne and Lauren Ormsbee May 4, 2022 Learn More