Hawkes v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, et al.

Court: Delaware Court of Chancery
Case Number: C.A. No. 2020-0360-PAF
Judge: Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr.
Case Contacts: Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Edward G. Timlin, Daniel Meyer

This stockholder class action on behalf of former stockholders of TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation (“Ameritrade”) challenges the stock-for-stock merger (the “Merger”) of Ameritrade and The Charles Schwab Corporation (“Schwab”).  In connection with the Merger, Schwab entered into an agreement (the “Amended IDA Agreement”) with The Toronto-Dominion Bank (together with its affiliates, “TD Bank”).  TD Bank was Ameritrade’s controlling stockholder, and the Amended IDA Agreement is worth hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars to TD Bank.

The amended complaint alleges that the Merger was the product of an unfair process that resulted in an unfair price for Ameritrade’s stockholders.  Specifically, the amended complaint alleges that, before the Merger, Ameritrade and TD Bank were parties to a prior agreement (the “IDA Agreement”) that significantly diverged from market terms and that was extremely favorable to TD Bank.  The IDA Agreement was set to expire in the coming years, and it was more favorable to Schwab to terminate the IDA Agreement and either enter into a new one on market terms or not contract out the services and perform them itself.  Instead, Schwab directly negotiated with TD Bank the Amended IDA Agreement, which funneled Merger consideration directly to TD Bank in exchange for its support for the Merger.  Ameritrade directors stood by idly and allowed this diversion of value that should have been paid pro rata to all Ameritrade stockholders.

The amended complaint, filed on February 5, 2021, asserts breach of fiduciary duty claims against TD Bank, as Ameritrade’s controller, and certain Ameritrade officers and directors.  The amended complaint also asserts a claim against Schwab for aiding and abetting such breaches.

Other Cases of Interest

  • Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
    District of Delaware Katherine M. Sinderson, Gregory V. Varallo, Robert Kravetz, Michael Mathai, Will Horowitz
  • Symantec Corporation
    Northern District of California Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jeremy P. Robinson, Rebecca E. Boon, R. Ryan Dykhouse
  • Baker Hughes Incorporated
    Delaware Court of Chancery Gregory V. Varallo, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Edward G. Timlin
  • Williams Companies
    Delaware Court of Chancery Mark Lebovitch, Gregory V. Varallo, Thomas James
  • SCANA Corporation
    District of South Carolina (Columbia Division) John C. Browne, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, Michael Mathai, Kate Aufses
  • Intel Corporation
    Northern District of California John Rizio-Hamilton, Jeroen van Kwawegen, James M. Fee, Lauren M. Cruz
  • Wells Fargo
    Southern District of New York Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Lauren M. Cruz, Will Horowitz
  • Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc.
    Delaware Chancery Court Mark Lebovitch, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Christopher J. Orrico, Alla Zayenchik
  • Biomarin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Northern District of California Jonathan D. Uslaner, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Avi Josefson, Thomas Sperber
  • Synchrony Financial
    District of Connecticut Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Adam H. Wierzbowski, Scott R. Foglietta, Kate Aufses, Matthew Traylor