|Court:||United States District Court for the Northern District of California|
|Class Period:||05/11/2017 - 08/02/2018|
|Case Leaders:||Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jeremy P. Robinson, Rebecca E. Boon|
|Case Team:||Andrew Boruch, Ryan Candee, Ryan McCurdy, Brian Chau|
Please note the Claim Form is no longer available.
This is a securities fraud class action filed on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly-traded common stock of Symantec Corporation (“Symantec” or the “Company”) during the period from May 11, 2017, to August 2, 2018, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and who were damaged thereby (the “Class”). The action alleges claims pursuant to Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Symantec, the world’s largest provider of cyber security software and services, and its former Chief Executive Officer, Gregory S. Clark.
Lead Plaintiff Has Settled the Action for $70 Million
The Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff, SEB Investment Management AB (“SEB” or “Lead Plaintiff”), on behalf of itself and the Class, has settled the Action for $70,000,000 in cash (the “Settlement”).
On February 10, 2022, the Court held a hearing to consider final approval of the Settlement and related matters. Following the hearing, the Court entered an order finally approving the Settlement, approving the Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlement, and awarding attorney's fees and litigation expenses.
You may visit the case website, SymantecSecuritiesLitigation.com, for more information about the Settlement.
The Claims Administrator has completed the processing of Claims received and, on September 28, 2022, the Court entered an Order approving the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to eligible claimants. The Claims Administrator conducted the distribution of settlement funds to eligible claimants on October 28, 2022. Subsequent distributions will occur on a rolling basis.
Commenced on May 17, 2018, the case arises from an alleged accounting fraud that manipulated Symantec’s reported financial results to trigger compensation awards for its top executives. Specifically, during the Class Period, Symantec represented that it had accurately reported the Company’s non-GAAP financial measures, that it maintained effective internal controls over financial reporting, and that its executive compensation program aligned the interests of management and shareholders. Lead Plaintiff alleges that, in truth, the Company misrepresented its non-GAAP financial measures to meet financial targets used to determine compensation for the Company’s most senior officers.
On May 10, 2018, Symantec announced that the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors had commenced an internal investigation into the Company’s accounting practices due to concerns raised by a whistleblower, that the Company had contacted the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the matter, and that in light of the pending internal investigation Symantec would not be timely filing its annual report. On this news, Symantec’s stock price plummeted from $29.18 per share on May 10, 2018 to $19.52 per share on May 11, 2018, over 33%, erasing roughly $6 billion of market capitalization. On August 2, 2018, after the market closed, Symantec filed a report with the SEC, disclosing that the Audit Committee’s investigation was “ongoing” and applied specifically to Symantec’s reported fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018 results. On August 3, 2018, Symantec’s share price fell by a further $1.63, or approximately 8%.
On August 23, 2018, the court appointed SEB as Lead Plaintiff and subsequently approved SEB’s selection of BLB&G to serve as Lead Counsel for the Class.
On December 26, 2018, Defendants moved to dismiss to the Complaint. After full briefing, the Court heard argument at a hearing in San Francisco on January 31, 2019. On June 14, 2019, the Court dismissed the Complaint, granting Lead Plaintiff leave to file a motion to amend. Lead Plaintiff filed its Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint on July 11, 2019. On July 16, 2019, after Lead Plaintiff filed its Motion, the Court unsealed certain relevant documents in a related derivative action. On July 23, 2019, Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint to include relevant information from said documents and other additional relevant facts uncovered in connection with Lead Plaintiff’s further investigation. The Court held a hearing on September 26 and granted Lead Plaintiff’s motion on October 2, 2019, sustaining Plaintiffs’ claims against Symantec and its former CEO and ordering Defendants to answer those claims. Lead Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint on October 11, 2019 to conform the pleading to the Court’s October 2 opinion. Defendants answered the complaint on November 7, 2019, and the case proceeded to discovery. Additionally, the parties completed briefing on Plaintiff’s motion for class certification on March 13, 2020.
On May 8, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for class certification in full, certifying the entire Class for the Class Period. Beginning on June 19, 2020, potential members of the Class were mailed a Notice of Pendency of Class Action and had the opportunity to request exclusion from the Class by August 25, 2020. On September 14, 2020, the parties engaged in a Court-ordered mediation process before the Honorable Donna M. Ryu, which did not result in a settlement at that time. Fact discovery concluded on January 29, 2021, and Plaintiff served its initial expert reports the same day. Expert discovery concluded on March 5, 2021. Defendants filed their motion for summary judgment on March 4, 2021, which was fully briefed on March 25, 2021.
On April 20, 2021, the Court entered an Order that required Class Counsel Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP and Lead Plaintiff to provide a Supplemental Notice to the Class in order to (a) inform Class Members of the circumstances described in the Order of the Court dated April 20, 2021, including that Class Counsel hired Hans Ek, the former Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Lead Plaintiff; and (b) provide Class Members with a second opportunity to request exclusion from the Class by July 2, 2021.
After the end of fact and expert discovery and following full briefing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Parties scheduled a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on May 24, 2021. (An earlier settlement conference with Judge Ryu in September 2020 had been unsuccessful.) During the May 24, 2021 settlement conference, the Parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the Action for $70,000,000.
On June 8, 2021, the Parties entered into the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, which sets forth the terms and conditions of the Settlement. On July 6, 2021, Lead Plaintiff moved for preliminary approval of the Settlement, and on September 16, 2021, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement, authorized that notice of the Settlement be sent to Class Members, and scheduled the final Settlement Fairness Hearing for February 10, 2022.
Following the final approval hearing on February 10, 2022, the Court entered an order finally approving the Settlement, approving the Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlement, and awarding attorney's fees and litigation expenses.
The deadline for submitting a Claim Form to receive a payment under the Settlement was March 10, 2022.
On July 19, 2022, Lead Plaintiff filed its Unopposed Motion for Approval of Distribution Plan (“Distribution Motion”), which, among other things, asked the Court to approve the determinations of the Claims Administrator accepting and rejecting the Claims submitted and allow a distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to eligible claimants.
On September 28, 2022, the Court entered an Order approving the Distribution Motion and authorizing the Claims Administrator to distribute the Net Settlement Fund to eligible claimants. The Claims Administrator conducted the distribution of settlement funds to eligible claimants on October 28, 2022.
- Publications “Section 11’s Tracing Doctrine Goes Up to the Supreme Court” by John C. Browne and Lauren Ormsbee Published in The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation March 17, 2023 Learn More
- News BLB&G Trial Team Achieves Precedent-Setting Victory in Delaware Court of Chancery March 17, 2023 Learn More
- Events BLB&G Partner Christopher Orrico and Senior Counsel Thomas James Teach Seminar at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law March 15, 2023 Learn More
- Events BLB&G Partner Rebecca Boon to Serve as Panelist at NautaDutilh’s General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Event March 6, 2023 Learn More
- Events BLB&G's Catherine van Kampen and Katie Sinderson to Speak at NYCBA’s 4th Annual Law Conference on the Status of Women March 2, 2023 Learn More