|Court:||Delaware Court of Chancery|
|Case Leaders:||Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Edward G. Timlin|
|Case Team:||Thomas James, Mae Oberste|
This stockholder class action seeks damages for minority stockholders of Pivotal Software, Inc. (“Pivotal”), who were cashed out in the acquisition of Pivotal that was orchestrated and effectuated by its controlling stockholders (the “Acquisition”). On June 4, 2020, BLB&G and its co-counsel, filed the class action complaint (the “Complaint”). On August 14, 2020, BLB&G was appointed co-lead counsel in the case, and its client was appointed lead plaintiff. Links to the Complaint and leadership order can be found under the Case Documents section of this page.
The Complaint alleges that Pivotal’s controlling stockholders—VMware, Inc. (VMware”), Dell Technologies Inc. (“Dell”), and Michael Dell (“M. Dell”)—opportunistically acquired Pivotal at a below-market price to capture the Company’s generational enterprise software technology without instituting sufficient procedural protections to insulate the controllers’ coercive influence over the process. Pivotal was an enterprise software application company, which Dell, VMware, and M. Dell controlled through, among other things, their ownership of Pivotal stock and their partner relationships to sell Pivotal’s enterprise software. VMware, Dell, and M. Dell exercised their control to roll Pivotal up into VMware.
M. Dell set the Acquisition process into motion and VMware formed a special committee and began conducting diligence shortly thereafter. Pivotal, however, did not form a special committee for several months and that committee retained pre-selected advisors with thick ties to the controllers. Although Pivotal provided substantial diligence to VMware, VMware did not condition the Acquisition on approval by Pivotal’s special committee and a minority stockholder vote for months after the process began. VMware took advantage of an abnormally poor fiscal quarter to acquire Pivotal on the cheap and timed its offer to prevent Pivotal’s stock price from impounding subsequent positive quarterly results. Unlike minority stockholders, Dell received VMware stock in the Acquisition, allowing it to share in the upside of the combined entity, as well as maintaining preferential tax benefits.
The Complaint asserts breach of fiduciary duty claims against (i) Dell, M. Dell, and VMware in their capacity as Pivotal’s controlling stockholders, (ii) M. Dell and Pivotal’s CEO Robert Mee in their capacity as former Pivotal directors, (iii) Mee and former Pivotal CFO Cynthia Gaylor in their capacity as former Pivotal officers; as well as (iv) a claim against VMware for aiding and abetting the foregoing breaches. After briefing and a hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss, on May 11, 2021, Chancellor McCormick substantially denied defendants’ motion to dismiss, leaving the primary defendants and the primary claims in the case. On November 4, 2021, BLB&G was appointed co-lead counsel in the case, and its client was appointed class representative. Plaintiff has litigated this action through fact and expert discovery and a five-day trial is scheduled to begin on July 6, 2022. The transcript decision and class certification order can be viewed under the Case Documents section of this page.
- Events BLB&G Partners John Rizio-Hamilton and Jesse Jensen to Present PLI Webinar, Auditor Litigation Considerations September 29, 2022 Learn More
- Events BLB&G's John Rizio-Hamilton and Nicole Santoro To Speak at the Federal Bar Council Panel, "Life of a Federal Law Clerk" September 27, 2022 Learn More
- Events BLB&G Partners Rebecca Boon and John Rizio-Hamilton Will Co-Present The ABA Webinar ESG Considerations In Securities Litigation September 23, 2022 Learn More
- Events BLB&G Partner Rebecca Boon Serves as Panelist at The Conference Board’s Leadership Council on Advancing Women September 22, 2022 Learn More
- Awards The New York Law Journal Recognizes Founding Partner Max Berger With Its Lifetime Achievement Award September 21, 2022 Learn More