Jerry Silk Discusses Supreme Court Review of Investor Protections in Tellabs, Inc. on CNBC's Power Lunch
March 27, 2007
The Supreme Court is poised to render a ruling that could potentially limit shareholder access to the courts. The issue for the Supreme Court in Tellabs, Inc. centers around the provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that requires claimants to allege detailed facts sufficient to establish "a strong inference'' that the defendants acted with scienter, or the intent to commit fraud. Mr. Silk fears that even "good cases like the Enrons and the Worldcoms" wouldn't qualify as legitimate cases should the Supreme Court's verdict set the pleading standard too high.
This follows a recent push by political and corporate interest groups to rollback investor protections and limit the accountability of corporate institutions, as outlined by the "Interim Report" of the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation (widely known as "The Paulson Committee" for its association with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson), and the "McKinsey Report," commissioned by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Senator Charles Schumer. Most recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission also abandoned years of advocacy on behalf of investors by submitting an amicus curiae ("friend of the Court") brief in Tellabs, Inc. by arguing in favor of the defendants and in support of an extremely stringent interpretation of the securities fraud pleading standard.
On behalf of 11 public pension funds, the firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Grant & Eisenhofer have submitted their amicus brief arguing against raising the pleading standard, because the current strong inference standard as established by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is the standard Congress intended to adopt when it passed the PSLRA in 1995 in an effort to reduce frivolous securities fraud lawsuits.
Also of Interest
ISS SCAS Releases Top Securities Settlements Report: Bernstein Litowitz Leads the Field for Ninth Consecutive Year
February 11, 2019
Benchmark Names Seven BLB&G Partners as Litigation Stars
Gerald Silk Named a Lawdragon 500 “Legend”
June 19, 2018
Law360 Profiles BLB&G as a 2018 “Class Action Group of the Year”
January 18, 2019
Investors Represented by BLB&G Prevail In Significant Ninth Circuit Win
September 13, 2017
BLB&G’s Max Berger Joins the Columbia Law School Public Interest/Public Service Council
The National Law Journal Profiles BLB&G – Winner of Financial Litigation Elite Trial Lawyers Award
December 19, 2016
MarketWatch Documentary on #metoo Features Coverage of BLB&G’s Landmark Fox News Litigation
November 2, 2018
Benchmark Again Names BLB&G One of the Top Firms in the Nation
Benchmark Names Three BLB&G Partners to Its "40 & Under Hot List"