In re Willis Towers Watson plc Proxy Litigation
|Court:||United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia|
|Judge:||Judge: Hon. Anthony Trenga|
|Case Contacts:||Salvatore J. Graziano, John Rizio-Hamilton, Rebecca E. Boon, Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Jesse L. Jensen, Nicholas Gersh, Larry Hosmer|
This action (the “Action”) is brought on behalf of shareholders of Towers Watson & Co. (“Towers”) common stock as of both October 1, 2015, the record date for shareholders to be eligible to vote on the Merger of Towers and Willis Group Holdings plc (“Willis”), and January 4, 2016, the date the Merger closed, and concerns alleged materially untrue statements and material omissions made in proxy solicitations distributed to Towers stockholders concerning the Merger.
Lead Plaintiff Has Settled the Action for $75 Million
The Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff, The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of itself and the Class, has reached a settlement of the Action for $75,000,000 in cash that resolves the Action (the “Settlement”). In addition, a $15,000,000 settlement has also been reached in a related action brought in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Delaware Settlement”). On May 21, 2021, following a hearing, the Court entered a Judgment approving the Settlement and entered orders approving the Plan of Allocation and Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
If you are a member of the Class in this Action, your rights will be affected and you may be eligible for a payment from the Settlements. The Class consists of:
all persons and entities that were Towers shareholders, including shareholders of record and beneficial owners, as of both October 1, 2015, the record date for Towers shareholders to be eligible to vote on the Merger of Towers and Willis, and January 4, 2016, the date the Merger transaction between Towers and Willis closed, and who were allegedly damaged thereby.
Certain persons and entities are excluded from the Class by definition (see paragraph 39 of the Notice) or if they requested exclusion pursuant to the instructions set forth in the Notice.
To be a Class Member, you do not need to have held all the Towers shares that you owned on October 1, 2015 until January 4, 2016. You need only have continued to own at least some of that Towers common stock that you held on October 1, 2015 as of January 4, 2016. You are excluded from the Class if you sold all of your Towers shares before January 4, 2016. Any of your shares which were sold between October 1, 2015 and January 4, 2016 will not be eligible for recovery in the Settlements. If you held more Towers shares on January 4, 2016 than you held on October 1, 2015, then only the shares you held on October 1, 2015 are eligible for recovery in the Settlement.
In addition, you may also be eligible to participate in the Delaware Settlement if you held Towers shares of the close of trading on January 4, 2016 (regardless of when you purchased them).
Please read the Notice to fully understand your rights and options. Copies of the Notice and Claim Form can be found on the Case Documents page. You may also visit the Settlement website, http://willistowerswatsonshareholderlitigation.com/, for more information about the proposed Settlement and proposed Delaware Settlement.
Payments to eligible claimants will be made only after the completion of all claims processing. Please be patient, as this process will take some time to complete.
IMPORTANT DATES AND DEADLINES
|May 25, 2021||
Claim Filing Deadline. Claim Forms must be postmarked no later than May 25, 2021 to be eligible for a payment from the Settlements. A single claim form should be submitted for both Settlements.
The complaint in this matter was filed on November 21, 2017, and brought on behalf of all Towers Watson & Co. (“Towers”) shareholders as of October 1, 2015, the date Towers shareholders were eligible to vote on the merger between Willis Group Holdings plc (“Willis”) and Towers (the “Merger”). Defendants in this action are Willis Towers Watson plc (“Willis Towers Watson” or the “Company”), Towers, Willis, Towers’ former Chairman and CEO John Haley (“Haley”), Willis’ former CEO Dominic Casserley (“Casserley”), ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. (“ValueAct”), and ValueAct’s former CEO Jeffrey Ubben (“Ubben”).
In connection with the Merger, Defendants allegedly made numerous materially untrue statements and omissions of material fact concerning the fact that Haley, ValueAct, and Willis met during the Merger negotiations, including during a meeting in September 2015, and discussed a massive incentive compensation package that Haley would receive as the future CEO of the combined company, valued as high as $165 million over the three years following the Merger. Defendants allegedly further made numerous materially untrue statements and omissions of material fact concerning the fact that Haley had this conflict and did not seek the maximum additional compensation for Towers shareholders during the renegotiation of the Merger’s terms.
On January 22, 2018, the Regents of the University of California filed a motion for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and for approval of BLB&G as Co-Lead Counsel for the Class. The motion was granted on February 20, 2018. The Regents filed a consolidated amended complaint on March 9, 2018. Defendants filed motions to dismiss on April 13, 2018, with Towers, Willis, Haley, and Casserley filing one motion to dismiss and ValueAct and Ubben filing a separate motion to dismiss. Lead Plaintiff filed its opposition on May 7, 2018, and Defendants filed their replies on May 14, 2018. The Court heard oral argument on the motions to dismiss on May 18, 2018. On July 12, 2018, the Court granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss, finding that the action was not brought within the one-year statute of limitations and that the alleged omissions were not material. The Regents timely appealed to the Fourth Circuit, and the Court held oral argument on May 8, 2019. On August 30, 2019, the Fourth Circuit vacated the District Court’s decision and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings. On November 8, 2019, Defendants filed additional motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff opposed these motions on December 9, 2019, and Defendants filed their replies on December 18, 2019. The District Court heard oral argument on December 20, 2019, and denied Defendants’ additional motions to dismiss on January 31, 2020. Defendants’ filed a subsequent motion to amend the District Court’s opinion and certify the opinion for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) on February 4, 2020. The District Court heard oral arguments on Defendants’ motion to certify on February 12, 2020 and denied the motion on February 18, 2020. Briefing on class certification was completed on July 20, 2020, and discovery concluded on August 10, 2020.
On September 4, 2020, as later modified on November 4, 2020, the District Court certified a class consisting of all Towers shareholders (both beneficial and record holders) as of both October 1, 2015, the record date for Towers shareholders to be eligible to vote on the Merger, and January 4, 2016, the date the Merger closed, and who were damaged thereby (the “Class”).
Starting in October 2020, the parties engaged in several weeks of back and forth settlement negotiations. On November 19, 2020, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle this action as well as a related action asserting fiduciary-duty claims in Delaware state court for a total of $90 million, consisting of $75 million to settle the federal claims and $15 million to settle the Delaware state claims.
On January 15, 2021, the parties entered into a Stipulation setting forth the full terms and conditions of the Settlement. That same day, Lead Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement. On January 21, 2021, the Court granted preliminary approval and authorized distribution of the notice of settlement to the certified Class. The Court also scheduled the hearing for final settlement approval for May 21, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Following the Settlement Hearing on May 21, 2021, the Court entered a Judgment approving the Settlement and orders approving the Plan of Allocation and Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses.
Other Cases of Interest
Caremark / CVS
Delaware Court of Chancery Gerald H. Silk, Salvatore J. Graziano, Mark Lebovitch
WellCare Health Plans, Inc.
Middle District of Florida John Rizio-Hamilton, Jeremy P. Robinson
Southern District of New York John Rizio-Hamilton, Max W. Berger
Monster Worldwide, Inc.
New York County Salvatore J. Graziano, Adam H. Wierzbowski
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery Salvatore J. Graziano, Mark Lebovitch
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
Dallas County, Texas Salvatore J. Graziano, Hannah Ross, John Rizio-Hamilton
Northern District of California John Rizio-Hamilton, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Lauren M. Cruz, Matthew Traylor
Western District of Texas John Rizio-Hamilton, Hannah Ross, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Will Horowitz, Thomas Sperber
Western District of Pennsylvania Salvatore J. Graziano, Hannah Ross, Adam H. Wierzbowski, Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Jesse L. Jensen, Alexander T. Payne, Thomas Sperber, Jared Hoffman, Emily Strickland
Southern District of New York Salvatore J. Graziano, John Rizio-Hamilton, Scott R. Foglietta, Jai K. Chandrasekhar, Kate Aufses, Nicholas Gersh