In re Viacom Inc. Stockholders Litigation
|Court:||Delaware Court of Chancery|
|Judge:||Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights III|
|Case Contacts:||Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Edward G. Timlin, Andrew Blumberg, Daniel Meyer|
This stockholder class action on behalf of former Viacom, Incorporated (“Viacom”) stockholders challenges the stock-for-stock merger of Viacom and CBS, Inc. (the “Merger”). The Merger was accomplished at the behest of Viacom and CBS’s controlling stockholders, Shari Redstone (“Redstone”) and National Amusements Inc. The complaint alleges that the Merger was the product of an unfair process that resulted in an unfair price for Viacom’s stockholders. Specifically, as to process, the complaint alleges, among other things, that the Merger was negotiated by a conflicted special committee—consisting of directors Redstone appointed to the Viacom Board by written consent—that prioritized effectuating Redstone’s wishes (e.g., ensuring that Viacom’s CEO became CEO of the combined company) over the interests of Viacom’s stockholders. Illustrating the unfairness of the price, the complaint alleges that (i) in 2018, Viacom and CBS agreed to an exchange ratio of 0.6135 CBS shares for every Viacom share (implying a $12.8 billion Viacom enterprise value) before the potential merger fell through due to corporate governance disagreements, (ii) between the time the potential merger fell through in 2018 and the time CBS and Viacom agreed to the Merger in 2019, Viacom’s financial performance improved dramatically while CBS’s financial performance and prospects deteriorated, and (iii) Viacom’s stockholders received a worse exchange ratio in the Merger (0.59625) than was negotiated in 2018, implying that Viacom was worth $1 billion less than it was worth in 2018 before its financial performance improved dramatically.
The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty against (i) Viacom’s controlling stockholders; (ii) Viacom’s special committee that negotiated and recommended the Merger; and (iii) Viacom’s CEO.
On February 6, 2020 Vice Chancellor Slights appointed BLB&G as Lead Counsel and its client, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, as Lead Plaintiff.
On February 28, 2020 Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Verified Class Action Complaint. Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint, and on September 15, 2020 the Delaware Court of Chancery heard arguments on the Defendants' motions. On December 29, 2020 the Court largely denied Defendants' motions. (Click on "Case Documents" at left to view the Court's Opinion.)
BLB&G continues to vigorously prosecute this action. The matter is now in the discovery phase of litigation.
Other Cases of Interest
Delaware Court of Chancery Mark Lebovitch, Gregory V. Varallo, Thomas James
Northern District of California Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jeremy P. Robinson, Rebecca E. Boon, R. Ryan Dykhouse, Larry Hosmer,
Straight Path Communications Inc.
Delaware Chancery Court Mark Lebovitch, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Edward G. Timlin, Alla Zayenchik,
Delaware Court of Chancery Jeroen van Kwawegen, Edward G. Timlin, Gregory V. Varallo,
Biomarin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Northern District of California Jonathan D. Uslaner, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Avi Josefson
BGC Partners, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery Jeroen van Kwawegen, Christopher J. Orrico, Andrew Blumberg
Delaware Court of Chancery Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Christopher J. Orrico, Andrew Blumberg
Northern District of California John Rizio-Hamilton, Jeroen van Kwawegen, James M. Fee
District of Connecticut Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Adam H. Wierzbowski, Kate Aufses, Matthew Traylor