In re Viacom Inc. Stockholders Litigation
|Court:||Delaware Court of Chancery|
|Judge:||Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights III|
|Case Contacts:||Jeroen van Kwawegen, Gregory V. Varallo, Andrew Blumberg, Edward G. Timlin, Daniel Meyer|
This stockholder class action on behalf of former Viacom, Incorporated (“Viacom”) stockholders challenges the stock-for-stock merger of Viacom and CBS, Inc. (the “Merger”). The Merger was accomplished at the behest of Viacom and CBS’s controlling stockholders, Shari Redstone (“Redstone”) and National Amusements Inc. The complaint alleges that the Merger was the product of an unfair process that resulted in an unfair price for Viacom’s stockholders. Specifically, as to process, the complaint alleges, among other things, that the Merger was negotiated by a conflicted special committee—consisting of directors Redstone appointed to the Viacom Board by written consent—that prioritized effectuating Redstone’s wishes (e.g., ensuring that Viacom’s CEO became CEO of the combined company) over the interests of Viacom’s stockholders. Illustrating the unfairness of the price, the complaint alleges that (i) in 2018, Viacom and CBS agreed to an exchange ratio of 0.6135 CBS shares for every Viacom share (implying a $12.8 billion Viacom enterprise value) before the potential merger fell through due to corporate governance disagreements, (ii) between the time the potential merger fell through in 2018 and the time CBS and Viacom agreed to the Merger in 2019, Viacom’s financial performance improved dramatically while CBS’s financial performance and prospects deteriorated, and (iii) Viacom’s stockholders received a worse exchange ratio in the Merger (0.59625) than was negotiated in 2018, implying that Viacom was worth $1 billion less than it was worth in 2018 before its financial performance improved dramatically.
The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty against (i) Viacom’s controlling stockholders; (ii) Viacom’s special committee that negotiated and recommended the Merger; and (iii) Viacom’s CEO.
On February 6, 2020 Vice Chancellor Slights appointed BLB&G as Lead Counsel and its client, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, as Lead Plaintiff.
On February 28, 2020 Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Verified Class Action Complaint.
BLB&G continues to vigorously prosecute this action.
Other Cases of Interest
Delaware Chancery Court Gregory V. Varallo, Mark Lebovitch, Christopher J. Orrico, Jacqueline Y. Ma , Thomas James
Northern District of California Gerald H. Silk, Avi Josefson, James A. Harrod, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Adam Hollander, Jai K. Chandrasekhar
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
District of Maryland Jeroen van Kwawegen, Christopher J. Orrico, Thomas James
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
District of Delaware Katherine M. Sinderson, Gregory V. Varallo, Michael Mathai
BGC Partners, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery Jeroen van Kwawegen, Christopher J. Orrico, Andrew Blumberg
Southern District of California Salvatore J. Graziano, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Richard D. Gluck, Rebecca E. Boon, Kyle Panton, Lauren M. Cruz
Northern District of California John C. Browne, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Michael Mathai, Lauren M. Cruz
District of South Carolina (Columbia Division) John C. Browne, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, Michael Mathai, Kate Aufses
Northern District of California Jeroen van Kwawegen, Jeremy P. Robinson, Rebecca E. Boon