Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Eric Brandt et al.
|Court:||Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware|
|Case Contacts:||Mark Lebovitch, David Wales, Avi Josefson, David MacIsaac|
On February 20, 2017, BLB&G filed a complaint in the Delaware Chancery Court on behalf of the Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System and derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo” or the “Company”) against current directors and senior executives’ officers of the Company (the "Defendants"). The Complaint was filed following an extensive investigation, including obtaining books and records of Yahoo pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporations Law,
The Complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties by the Company’s board of directors and senior executive officers to conceal the largest security breach in history for a single website that compromised sensitive private information for more than 500 million Yahoo users. Yahoo has subsequently admitted in public filings that the Company knew about the security breach as early as December 2014, but failed to disclose them to Yahoo users (the “2014 Security Incident”). The Complaint alleges that the failure to timely disclose the 2014 Security Incident violated the law and was inconsistent with Yahoo’s past practices, and has exposed the Company to significant damages, investigations and lawsuits.
The Complaint further alleges that the board of directors and senior executive officers breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to conceal the 2014 Security Incident from Verizon Communications (“Verizon”) and Yahoo stockholders in order to facilitate a sale of the Company’s core business. On July 25, 2016, Yahoo announced a deal with Verizon to sell Yahoo’s core business for $4.83 billion in cash, which included Yahoo’s advertising, content, search, and mobile activities. As part of the sale agreement, the board of directors and senior executive officers caused Yahoo to represent and warrant to Verizon that the Company did not know of any security incidents impacting the Company’s systems. However, the Complaint alleges that at the time these representations and warranties were made, Defendants knew of the 2014 Security Incident but failed to disclose it to Verizon. As a result, Defendants caused the Company to agree to materially false representations and warranties, which allowed Verizon to reduce its offer by $350 million and require Yahoo to accept responsibility for at least 50% of any damages recovered by Yahoo users.
Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendants liable for their breaches of fiduciary duty for actively concealing the 2014 Security Incident, which has already caused substantial damages to the Company, injury to its reputation, and subjected it to numerous investigations and lawsuits.
Other Cases of Interest
- Comverse Technology, Inc.
Eastern District of New York Mark Lebovitch, Katherine M. Sinderson
- Williams Companies
Northern District of Oklahoma Mark Lebovitch, Brett M. Middleton
- Chesapeake Energy Corporation
District Court of Oklahoma County Gerald H. Silk, David R. Stickney, Mark Lebovitch, Timothy A. DeLange, Brett M. Middleton
- Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc.
County of Los Angeles Mark Lebovitch, Brett M. Middleton
- Longs Drug Stores Corporation Shareholder Litigation
Superior Court for the State of California, County of Contra Costa Mark Lebovitch, Brett M. Middleton
- New Senior Investment Group, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery Mark Lebovitch, David Wales, David MacIsaac, John Vielandi
- Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.
Delaware Chancery Court Max W. Berger, Mark Lebovitch, David Wales, Rebecca E. Boon
- Quality Systems, Inc.
Central District of California Gerald H. Silk, Avi Josefson, Benjamin Galdston
- Cobalt International Energy, Inc.
Southern District of Texas Avi Josefson, David R. Stickney, Jonathan D. Uslaner, Brandon Marsh, Jenny E. Barbosa