Home | Cases | Institutional Investor Services | News & Events | Publications | FAQs | Offices |Careers | Contact Us | Search

Our Firm Our People Our Practice Areas Our Results
About BLB&G

Praise From the Courts

Proven Trial Experience

Protecting Institutional
Investors


Protecting Employees
and Consumers


A Tradition of Public Service

Practice Areas

Offices

Practice Areas

Antitrust Litigation

The antitrust practice group at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP prosecutes traditional price-fixing and restraint of trade cases. A growing component in the firm's commercial litigation practice, the group utilizes both class action litigation methods and individual representation in federal and state courts throughout the United States. The antitrust group has prosecuted cases against manufacturers and producers of goods and services for illegal price fixing, illegal tying arrangements and other violations of the antitrust laws.

Antitrust laws exist in order to protect our free-market system. These laws were enacted to protect our competitive market from monopoly, price-fixing and unfair trade practices, such as bid rigging and price discrimination that reduce competition and endanger our free-enterprise system. Antitrust laws protect consumers and businesses from anticompetitive practices that unfairly inflate prices. Consumers and businesses are often injured by price collusion, abuse of market power and deceptive or fraudulent business practices. Antitrust laws also prohibit mergers and acquisitions that can potentially inhibit competition and create a monopoly. Antitrust class action cases are usually brought by individuals and businesses that have been injured by anti-competitive conduct of suppliers, purchasers and competitors. Our firm has developed the expertise and knowledge to represent consumers and businesses in a wide range of antitrust litigation against businesses that have engaged in antitrust violations.

A growing area in antitrust litigation is the development of cases against drug manufacturers for suppressing generic competition. Brand name drug manufacturers essentially hold a legal monopoly for a drug while it is under patent protection. Once the patent expires, generic drug makers may enter the market by offering the generic version of the drug at a significantly lower price which increases competition for the brand name drug manufacturer. In order to maintain monopoly pricing, brand name drug manufacturers have engaged in improper tactics such as bringing patent infringement litigation against generic manufacturers, entering into collusive license agreements with generic manufacturers and fraudulently extending the life of their products' patents.

If you feel that you have been the victim of anti-competitive actions and would like to discuss your potential claims, please contact Gerald Silk at 1-800-380-8496.

Have a question relating to our fields of expertise?
See answers to Frequently Asked Questions.


Home | Cases | Institutional Investor Services | News & Events | Publications | FAQs | Offices |Careers | Contact Us | Search

Site Map - Disclaimer - Attorney Advertising

For additional information please email your request to blbg@blbglaw.com or call us at 800-380-8496
©2008 Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP. All rights reserved.
This Web site contains Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.