Home | Cases | Institutional Investor Services | News & Events | Publications | FAQs | Offices | Careers | Contact Us | Search

Our Firm Our People Our Practice Areas Our Results
Current Cases

Recent Settlements

Securities Fraud,
Corporate Governance
and Shareholder Rights
Recoveries


Employment Discrimination
and Civil Rights Recoveries


Consumer and Fair Trade Protection Recoveries

In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Securities Litigation
(United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)

This is a securities fraud class action filed on behalf of a class of persons and entities who purchased or acquired the common stock of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“Bristol-Myers” or the “Company”) between March 21, 2006, through and including August 8, 2006 (the "Class Period").

On September 20, 2007, District Judge Paul A. Crotty of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed BLB&G client the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board as Lead Plaintiff and BLB&G as Lead Counsel for the Class. On October 15, 2007, Plaintiffs filed the Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”).

The Complaint’s allegations relate to Bristol-Myers’ closely-watched attempt to obtain approval for a proposed settlement agreement with a Canadian generic pharmaceutical company, Apotex Inc., to prevent Apotex from introducing into the marketplace a generic equivalent of Bristol-Myers’ largest-selling drug, Plavix. The Company was required to obtain regulatory approval for the settlement under the terms of a consent decree resulting from past allegations of anti-competitive behavior against Bristol-Myers. The Company failed to disclose to investors that it had agreed to significant limitations on its damages and patent enforcement rights against Apotex if the regulators rejected the settlement.

When the proposed settlement did not receive regulatory approval, the Company did not disclose that failure to investors. Defendants instead entered into a renegotiated settlement agreement with Apotex, which now included secret oral terms which were not reported to investors, nor to the regulators. By using these secret oral side agreements, Defendants hoped to secure regulatory approval of the settlement agreement by criminally deceiving the regulators regarding the full terms of the amended agreement. However, unbeknownst to Defendants, outside counsel to Apotex confidentially reported the unlawful oral side agreements to the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and, as a result, the DOJ immediately opened a criminal investigation into Bristol-Myers. In late July 2006, the FBI raided the Company’s headquarters in New York City.

Shortly after the end of the Class Period, the Company announced the involuntary termination of both its CEO, Defendant Peter R. Dolan, and its General Counsel because of their conduct relating to the Apotex settlement agreement. In June 2007, the Company pled guilty to two criminal felony counts of making false statements to a government agency, admitting that the Company had failed to disclose important facts to the regulators regarding the proposed Apotex agreement.

On March 13, 2008, the parties argued Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint before Judge Crotty. That motion is pending.

Firm partner Salvatore Graziano and associates Jai Chandrasekhar, Noam Mandel, and Katherine Sinderson are responsible for prosecuting this action.


Home | Cases | Institutional Investor Services | News & Events | Publications | FAQs | Offices | Careers | Contact Us | Search

Site Map - Disclaimer - Attorney Advertising

For additional information please email your request to blbg@blbglaw.com or call us at 800-380-8496
© 2008 Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP. All rights reserved.
This Web site contains Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.