Home | Cases | Institutional Investor Services | News & Events | Publications | FAQs | Offices | Careers | Contact Us | Search

Our Firm Our People Our Practice Areas Our Results
Current Cases

Recent Settlements

Securities Fraud,
Corporate Governance
and Shareholder Rights
Recoveries


Employment Discrimination
and Civil Rights Recoveries


Consumer and Fair Trade Protection Recoveries

In re Biovail Corporation Securities Litigation
(United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)

This is a securities fraud class action filed on behalf of all investors who purchased the common stock of Biovail Corporation ("Biovail" or the “Company”) between February 7, 2003 and March 2, 2004 (the “Class Period”). Defendants include the Company and certain of its former senior officers and directors, including Eugene N. Melnyk, Biovail’s former Chairman and CEO. Biovail is a pharmaceutical company headquartered in Canada, with operations in the United States.

BLB&G and Ontario Teachers' Announce $138 Million Settlement

December 11, 2007After nearly four years of intensive litigation, Co-Lead Counsel BLB&G and its client, Court-appointed co-lead Plaintiff the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board ("OTPP"), announce a settlement agreement of $138 million in cash with Biovail Corporation and certain of its officers.  This is the second largest recovery in a securities case involving a Canadian issuer, second only to Nortelanother case in which OTPP was represented by BLB&G as Co-Lead Plaintiff.  The settlement is pending approval by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Lead Plaintiffs File Second Amended Complaint Under Seal; Ask Court to Unseal Complaint to Bring to Light Allegations Which Rebut High-Profile Biovail Lawsuit Against Hedge Funds and Financial Analysts

On August 25, 2006, Lead Plaintiffs filed under seal a Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint (the “SAC”), which, among other things, added as a named defendant Rolf Reininghaus, former Senior Vice President and member of the Company’s Executive Committee. The SAC sets forth a number of new allegations based on the discovery obtained to date. Specifically, the SAC alleges that Defendants (1) made false statements about the efficacy and purported unique medical benefits of CLA in an effort to bolster sales of the drug; (2) artificially stimulated demand for CLA by paying doctors to write prescriptions; and (3) concealed manufacturing problems which negatively impacted sales of the drug. The SAC further alleges that Defendants improperly booked millions of dollars of earnings on sales of CLA in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).

The SAC also addresses – and refutes -- the highly-publicized claims Biovail made in an action the Company filed on February 22, 2006 in New Jersey Superior Court against twenty-two separate defendants. In that lawsuit, Biovail alleges that the decline in the price of the Company’s stock during the Class Period was not due to the fraud alleged by Lead Plaintiffs, but to a supposed conspiracy between certain short-selling hedge funds and financial analysts, who allegedly conspired to manipulate the market by issuing false negative reports about the Company. On March 26, 2006, Biovail’s Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer, Eugene Melnyk, appeared on 60 Minutes, and reiterated to a national television audience the allegations that Biovail made in its action against the hedge funds. The SAC rebuts Biovail’s allegations by showing that the decline in the price of the stock that occurred during the Class Period was not the result of the supposed hedge fund conspiracy, but the fraud alleged by Lead Plaintiffs, and that much of what the analysts wrote about Biovail was accurate.

Lead Plaintiffs filed the Second Amended Complaint under seal because it quotes from documents that Defendants designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this Action. The Court has denied Lead Plaintiffs' motion to unseal the Second Amended Complaint.

In March 2007 the parties concluded briefing of Lead Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and on March 23, 2007, the parties argued the motion before Judge Owen. That motion is pending. The case is proceeding in active discovery.

Firm partner Steven Singer, Senior Counsel Rochelle Feder Hansen and Niki Mendoza and associate Katherine McCracken Sinderson are responsible for prosecuting this action.


Home | Cases | Institutional Investor Services | News & Events | Publications | FAQs | Offices | Careers | Contact Us | Search

Site Map - Disclaimer - Attorney Advertising

For additional information please email your request to blbg@blbglaw.com or call us at 800-380-8496
© 2008 Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP. All rights reserved.
This Web site contains Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.