Cases

Bach v. Amedisys, Inc.

Court: U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Case Number: 10-cv-00395-BAJ-CN
Judge: Hon. Brian A. Jackson
Class Period: 08/ 2/2005 - 09/30/2011
Case Contacts: John C. Browne, Adam H. Wierzbowski, Adam Hollander

Securities fraud class action filed on behalf of a class of persons and entities who purchased or acquired the securities of Amedisys, Inc. (“Amedisys” or “Company”) between August 2, 2005 and September 30, 2011 (the "Class Period").  Defendants include the Company and seven current or former members of the Company’s senior management, including  William Borne (Founder & CEO) (collectively, “Defendants”).  Amedisys is a provider of home health care services for aging and terminally ill patients.

On October 21, 2010, the Honorable Brian A. Jackson appointed BLB&G client the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi as co-Lead Plaintiff and BLB&G as co-Lead Counsel for the Class.

Lead Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants employed a fraudulent scheme to improperly inflate the reimbursement payments that Amedisys received from Medicare for providing home health services to the Company’s patients, by among other things: (i) pressuring and intimidating Amedisys nurses and therapists into providing medically unnecessary treatment visits to patients for the Company to hit highly-lucrative Medicare reimbursement triggers or targets; (ii) providing false information to Medicare that misrepresented the nature and severity of its patients’ medical conditions and functional capabilities in order to obtain higher Medicare reimbursements; (iii) certifying or recertifying patients for medically unnecessary 60-day treatment episodes and certifying or recertifying patients who were no longer homebound as required by Medicare rules; and (iv) paying or otherwise improperly inducing physicians to increase the physicians’ patient referrals to Amedisys.

On June 28, 2012, the Court granted the Defendants’ motions to dismiss the action (which Plaintiffs had opposed) on loss causation grounds. On July 26, 2012, Plaintiffs moved for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss ruling and asked the Court for leave to amend their Complaint, and the Defendants opposed that motion for reconsideration on August 29, 2012. On April 9, 2013, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and to amend the Complaint. On May 3, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to appeal the Court’s dismissal of the action. 

On October 2, 2014, the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the lower Court’s motion to dismiss and ordered that the case proceed.  In its decision, the Court of Appeals ruled that the district court’s assessment of loss causation was incorrect, writing that the Court “erred in imposing an overly rigid rule that government investigations can never constitute a corrective disclosure in the absence of a discovery of actual fraud.”  Rather, the Court of Appeals viewed Plaintiffs’ allegations of loss causation collectively, which included the resignations of key Amedisys executives, a front-page expose of Amedisys’s misconduct in The Wall Street Journal, the announcement of government investigations into Amedisys’s misconduct, and a dismal earnings report.  As the Fifth Circuit wrote in its important decision, given these facts supporting loss causation, “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.”

On April 3, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the Complaint, on April 8, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion, and on September 30, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Consolidated Securities Class Action Complaint.  Defendants moved to dismiss that Complaint on December 15, 2015, and Plaintiffs are due to oppose that motion on January 29, 2016.

naval-actor